Further Questions. If you have further questions please contact Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, xxxx@xxx.xx or 6550 1947 or International Staff Office’s mailbox at: xxx@xxx.xx.
Further Questions. The Grantee should consult with the Project Manager to resolve any sign issues. The logo is currently being developed and wilcanl be provided electronically as soon as possible. Exhibit I
Further Questions. If you have any other questions or concerns about this Program please contact Xxxxx Xxxxxxx, Doctors Manitoba Benefit Programs Coordinator, by phone: 000-0000 or 000-0000 or 1-888-322- 4242, fax: 000-0000, or e-mail xxxxxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx. SAMPLE CALCULATIONS
Further Questions. If you want to ask questions when deciding whether to accept this offer, or need to change your address, you may contact [Settlement Administrator], a third party that has been retained to administer this process at INSERT 1-800 NUMBER OR EMAIL ADDRESS or Class Counsel at INSERT 1-800 NUMBER OR EMAIL ADDRESS. Please do not contact the Court or Bank of America. Sincerely, [Insert Name] [Settlement Administrator Letterhead] [ , 2013] [Employee] Re: In Re Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation
Further Questions. If you want to ask questions when deciding whether to accept this offer, or need to change your address, you may contact [Settlement Administrator], a third party that has been retained to administer this process at INSERT 1-800 NUMBER OR EMAIL ADDRESS or Class Counsel at INSERT 1-800 NUMBER OR EMAIL ADDRESS. Please do not contact the Court or Bank of America. Sincerely, [Insert Name] EXHIBIT D Consent to Join IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS IN RE: BANK OF AMERICA WAGE AND HOUR EMPLOYMENT PRACTICES LITIGATION (This document relates to all cases) MDL No. 2138 Case No: 10-md-2138-JWL-KGS CONSENT TO JOIN ACTION AND SETTLEMENT, INCLUDING RELEASE OF CLAIMS I, the undersigned, hereby acknowledge that I have received and read the <DATE> Notice of Multidistrict Litigation Settlement (the “Settlement Notice”) and have had an opportunity to read and review a copy of the Consolidated Complaint (Court Doc. 42), the Settlement Agreement, and the Court’s approval order (the “Order” Court Doc. #XXX) available to me at xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/10-md-2138/ and www.[settlementwebsite].com, and I hereby consent to be a party plaintiff in the above-captioned lawsuit and to participate in the court-approved settlement of this action. In exchange for a payment pursuant to the court- approved settlement in this action, and except as identified in the Settlement Notice I received, I hereby agree not to sue the Released Parties (as defined in the court-approved settlement agreement and as set forth in the Order), including named Defendants Bank of America Corporation and Bank of America, N.A., for any Released Claims (as also defined in the court- approved settlement agreement and as set forth in the Order) as covered by the court-approved settlement of this action. I hereby acknowledge and agree that I am releasing and waiving all such Released Claims against the named Defendants and all such Released Parties in this action under federal, state, or other statutory or common laws that were or could have been asserted in, arise out of, or are related to the subject matter of this lawsuit, while employed as a non-exempt (hourly) employee in a banking center or call center at any time through the date that I sign this form. DATE: , 2014 SIGNATURE PRINTED NAME EXHIBIT E Reminder Postcard Bank of America Wage and Hour Employment Practices Litigation Settlement Our records show that you are a current or former employee of Bank of America. You are eligib...
Further Questions. 1) If at any time you would like to contact us with your views about our terms of use, you can do so by emailing us at xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx.
Further Questions. For any questions not addressed in this document, please contact the UK Space Agency xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx Frequently Asked Questions
Further Questions. If you have further questions, you should feel free to contact the following people: for questions regarding the research or in the unlikely event of research-related injury, Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx (tel. 000 0000); for questions about research subjects’ rights, doc. Ing. Xxxx Xxxxxxxx, CSc., the vice-xxxx for research and development at the Xxxxxxx university (tel. 000-0000).
Further Questions. If you have any further questions about your participation in the shared medical appointments please contact the surgery. By signing this consent form you are agreeing that you: • Understand what the shared medical appointments are and that you are happy to take part • Will help us to manage your safety relating to the gentle activity that you may participate in • Will keep any information that you share, hear or receive as part of the shared medical appointment strictly confidential • Will respect the views and opinions of others within the shared medical appointment • Understand that you can leave the pilot project at any time (and re-join should you wish to) If you are happy to proceed, please sign below: Patient name (Please print) Patient signature Date
Further Questions. Our interest in results like Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 is not just motivated by an interest in approval voting. Rather, approval voting provides a convenient presentation of a broader mathematical problem: given a family of sets, is their intersection nonempty? Treating each set as the approval set of a voter, this amounts to asking whether there is a single platform with the approval of all voters. Or, even if a family of sets has empty intersection, is there a sense in which many of the sets must have nonempty intersection? Studying (k, m)-agreeability and its consequences is one line of approach to these questions. A A A A Let be a family of subsets of a set X. An -society is a society with spectrum X and approval sets in . What is the best lower bound we can put on the agreement proportion of (k, m)-agreeable -societies? A few cases of interest are the connected subsets of a topological space (particularly graphs), the open balls of a metric space, the convex subsets of an affine space, and solid rectangles in Rn. (Linear societies can be seen as a special case of any of these; circular societies are a special case of the first two.) Some known set-intersection theorems can be seen in this light. Su et al. [1] point to Xxxxx’s theorem [3] as an example, which we reproduce here. An Rd-convex society is a society with spectrum Rd and convex approval sets. Xxxxx’s theorem (below) tells us that a (d+1, d+1)-agreeable Rd-convex society has agreement proportion 1.